• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

Prevent retaliation claims by maintaining confidentiality of bias, harassment complaints

05/27/2011
It’s tough to pin retaliation on a supervisor who never knew about an employee’s original complaint. That’s why it makes sense to limit access to information about employee complaints. For example, there’s no need to share an employee’s discrimination complaint with her supervisor if it doesn’t involve that supervisor or department.

Remind managers: They may be personally liable for discrimination under obscure law

05/27/2011
Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, super­visors can’t be held individually liable for discrimination. However, the little-noticed Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 does allow individual liability for discrimination claims.

Despite EPA’s gender-equity requirements, you do have discretion to set wide salary

05/27/2011

The Equal Pay Act requires employers to pay women and men equally for substantially equal work. Gender can’t be a salary factor. That doesn’t mean employers don’t have considerable flexibility when setting salaries. The fact is that dozens of reasons that have nothing to do with the applicant’s sex may jus­tify different pay scales.

OK to consider stable work history when hiring

05/27/2011
A lot of factors go into hiring the best possible candidate for a job, including experience, education and employment stability. Those are all legitimate reasons to prefer one candidate over another.

Lawyer drops bias suit; no dirt will be dished

05/27/2011
JoEllen Lyons Dillon has dropped a sex discrimination lawsuit against the Reed Smith law firm in Pittsburgh, a sudden reversal that suggests the parties may have reached a settlement.

Allegheny Port Authority says race charges were trumped up

05/27/2011
The latest chapter in an ongoing legal battle opened recently when the Alle­gheny Port Authority responded to charges leveled by Deborah Blocker, a black employee who has alleged racial harassment.

Age bias requires showing substantial age difference

05/27/2011
The ADEA protects workers age 40 or older from discrimination based on their age. But winning an ADEA case doesn’t require an employee to prove that the employer gave preferential treatment to someone younger than 40. She just has to show that the favored employee was “substantially” younger than the older employee.

Not every romantic advance equals harassment

05/27/2011
Courts understand: Occasionally, romantic sparks fly between people who work together. They recognize that it’s not always harassment, even—under some circumstances—when the couple includes a supervisor. The key is whether or not the conduct is welcome.

Tales from the front lines …

05/27/2011
Mexican food is great, but is it art? A cook sued his former em­­ployer, a Mexican restaurant, for un­­paid overtime. The owners put forth a creative defense: that the cook was exempt from the FLSA overtime requirements because he was a “creative professional.”

Don’t take the rap for employee’s after-hours harassment

05/26/2011

Courts are beginning to realize that there is only so much an employer can do to prevent sexual harassment. Take, for example, alleged sexual harassment that occurs off-duty and off-premises. While it’s likely that employers would be responsible for a supervisor’s sexual assault or harassment, chances are they won’t be held liable for the same conduct by a co-worker.