• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Terminations

Fired employee wants termination letter, access to personnel files

08/12/2008
Q. An employee we recently terminated has asked us to provide him with a letter explaining the reasons for his termination. He also has asked for a copy of his personnel file. Are we required to respond? …

Sour environment doesn’t warrant constructive discharge

08/12/2008
Employees who believe they are being discriminated against and can no longer tolerate their work environments may quit and sue, claiming they had no choice. That’s the basis for a “constructive discharge” claim. But it takes more than an unpleasant work environment to justify the resignation as constructive discharge …

Can we withhold accrued vacation pay if employee doesn’t give two weeks’ notice?

08/12/2008
Q. Our company policy is to not pay an employee for unused vacation time if the employee resigns without giving the required two weeks’ notice. A former employee has challenged this policy and is threatening to take the company to court. Is this policy lawful? …

Prepare thorough record if ‘Star’ employee begins to fall

08/11/2008
Nothing looks worse to a jury than an employer who fires an employee for poor performance after the employee receives stellar performance reviews. That’s why you must make sure supervisors and managers prepare honest evaluations, avoid gushing assessments and stick to objective measures …

FIU loses discrimination suit

08/11/2008
A Miami-Dade County jury ruled that Florida International University (FIU) discriminated against Sean St. Louis when it fired him in 2004. If the verdict stands, an already cash-strapped FIU will have to pay $2.5 million to St. Louis …

$46.7 million for manager who blew the whistle on age discrimination

08/11/2008
In the midst of a merger that would make it the second-largest waste collection company in the country, Republic Services Inc., based in Fort Lauderdale, has been ordered to pay $46.7 million for wrongfully firing an employee and doctoring company records to justify its actions …

Extra work, harsh treatment may not be reverse discrimination

08/11/2008
Resentment may run high if employees feel like they’re picking up the slack for other employees they perceive as doing less than required—especially if they believe management isn’t making others pull their fair share because of race or nationality or some other protected classification. But that doesn’t necessarily amount to reverse discrimination …

May we terminate a disabled employee who can’t perform an essential function?

08/08/2008
Q. One of our employees was hired to a position that requires her to drive to customers’ offices. When we hired her, she reviewed and signed a job description that included a statement “that transportation was an essential function of her job.” Public transportation is not a realistic option. She recently received test results suggesting she might be suffering from multiple sclerosis. She provided a return-to-work slip indicating she would be able to return to work on a part-time basis but would not be able to drive or do heavy lifting. We told her we cannot accommodate her restrictions, but we provided a four-month leave of absence. Assuming she will not be able to drive when she returns, are we within our rights to discharge her? Are we going to violate her rights under the ADA or Michigan disability laws? …

Tab tops $60,000 in firing of pregnant bartender

08/08/2008
In November 2004, members of the board of Maracci Temple 13 in Detroit called Eronda Garner into a meeting. Garner, a part-time bartender for the Grenadier Lounge, which the temple runs, was pregnant. The board told her she was being let go because it feared tending bar was unsafe for a pregnant woman …

Employee ‘Family & friends’ can now bring EEOC retaliation claims

08/08/2008
Earlier this year, the U. S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, whose decisions apply to Michigan employers, expanded the coverage of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s anti-retaliation provision when it held that the fiancé of an employee who made a complaint to the EEOC could bring a retaliation action when he was discharged by the employer …