11/29/2018
Q: “Regarding the FLSA, a salaried exempt computer professional puts in for 16 hours vacation but ends up with 92 actual work hours for the 80-hour pay period. He/she does not delete the vacation hours from their timesheet, and I am being instructed to still take the vacation time from their PTO bank. Of course, I know that this is not fair. However, is this even legal?
“One more FLSA scenario: A salaried exempt employee works 102 actual work hours during an 80-hour pay period. Of course, he/she is paid their regular salary for that pay period. The following pay period, they only work 78 hours. I am being instructed to make them use PTO for the two additional hours to make a full 80 hours. Again, is this allowed under FLSA?” — Donna, New Jersey
11/19/2018
Q: “We recently started making provisional offers to applicants, and we give them a form to sign that is a ‘declaration of no criminal activity.’ The reason we are doing this is because the hiring process takes so much longer when an applicant’s criminal background comes back ‘under review.’ So now, after we make the provisional offer, if the report comes back ‘under review’ we can still move forward with them and as long as it comes back clear or with items that are within our state regs (we are an elder care company), there should be no problem. If someone comes back with something on their record that we are not able to accept, is it okay to tell them we are rescinding the offer based on that, especially as they signed the form stating they had no criminal activity? Could there be consequences to the organization?” –Anonymous, Pennsylvania