• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Retaliation

Use formal application processes to ward off failure-to-hire/promote lawsuits

12/13/2011
You might assume that, before suing for failure to hire, job seekers and employees going for promotions would have to actually apply for the jobs they didn’t get. Unless your company has a robust, easy-to-use posting and application process, you could be wrong.

Sometimes, even harsh judges take pity on employers

12/07/2011
When a jury concluded that a supervisor got a subordinate fired for complaining about race discrimination, it zapped the employer with huge punitive damages in addition to back pay. However, it will only have to pay a fraction of that amount.

When employee complains about bias, take control ASAP to prevent retaliation

12/07/2011

When an employee complains about perceived discrimination, how you treat the worker can greatly affect the outcome if the case reaches court. The best approach: Handle the case professionally, at the HR function level.

Passage of time can kill retaliation claim

12/05/2011

There’s some good news for em­­ployers concerned about retaliation after an employee participates in protected activity such as testifying in another employee’s discrimination lawsuit. If a substantial amount of time has passed since the employee’s testimony, any disciplinary action you take probably won’t be enough to form the basis of a retaliation claim.

On to trial for worker advocate’s retaliation claim

12/02/2011
Employees and their lawyers are getting more creative with their lawsuits. Not content to rely on federal anti-discrimination laws, they add claims under state law, too. That increases their chances of making a claim stick.

Only one bite at the apple when it comes to bias cases

11/30/2011
A Texas court has headed off an employee’s attempt to sue twice for the same discrimination claim—once in federal court and again in Texas.

Court: Punishment for helping outsider file harassment complaint isn’t retaliation

11/30/2011
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Thompson v. North American Stain­­less decision said that it was illegal retaliation to punish the fiancé of someone who had complained about sexual harassment. But what about punishing an em­­­­­­ployee because an outsider has filed sexual harassment charges? Accord­­ing to a recent decision, that isn’t illegal under Title VII.

Warn bosses: Email will be used against you

11/28/2011
You’ve told managers before, now tell ’em again: Email may seem like private communication, but it really isn’t. Anything a manager says in an email may become evidence in a lawsuit.

New hire running into trouble right away? Document problems early and often

11/25/2011

Once in a while, the honeymoon is barely over before a new em­­ployee starts to struggle. Since every job has a learning curve, you may hesitate to terminate right away. But you can’t ignore the problems, either.

Sexual harassment settlement costs $462,500 for Irvine firm

11/18/2011
A pool supply company recently agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by the EEOC accusing it of sexual har­ass­ment, retaliation and constructive discharge. Irvine-based Aqua Tri will pay $462,500 to 18 Hispanic workers.