• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

Discrimination / Harassment

$1 damage award in University of Minnesota harassment case

05/17/2017
A federal jury has awarded just $1 in damages to a former University of Minnesota doctoral student in a two-year-old case that alleged a professor had sexually harassed her on a research trip to Alaska.

Sealy settles harassment charges for $175,000

05/17/2017
Sealy of Minnesota has agreed to settle charges it failed to properly address and end racial harassment at its mattress and box spring factory in St. Paul.

Minnesota Supreme Court: Discriminatory animus not required in pregnancy bias case

05/17/2017
The Minnesota Supreme Court has remanded a case involving pregnancy discrimination. The trial court will have to decide whether an employer revoked a job offer due to pregnancy.

When promoting from within, make sure you provide anti-harassment training

05/17/2017
Remember, employers can be held liable for managerial harassment, even if they’re unaware that anything wrong is happening. Show your good-faith effort to prevent harassment by documenting that you provided training to new managers.

Tough economy no excuse for pay bias

05/17/2017
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that an economic downturn cannot be used as an excuse to justify continuing unequal pay under the Equal Pay Act.

EEOC weighs in: Most sexual harassment training doesn’t work

05/16/2017
The EEOC receives over 30,000 harassment complaints each year, and that may just be the tip of the iceberg. One EEOC-com­­missioned survey found that three out of four employees who experience harassment never complain through their employer’s established channels.

The O’Reilly Factor: Claw backs and the ‘faithless servant’

05/16/2017
In the world of controversial show host Bill O’Reilly, personal responsibility has given way to excuses and coddling, prompting the question: Where is good, old-fashioned comeuppance when it is needed? In O’Reilly’s case, we now have an answer to that question.

Gay employee can claim bias based on gender stereotyping

05/16/2017
Courts are currently working out whether discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is sex discrimination under Title VII. However, that’s not the only way to challenge anti-gay bias.

Forbid reinstatement when settling lawsuits

05/16/2017
Be sure to consider all the ramifications of settling an employee’s discrimination lawsuit, especially if the settlement includes reinstatement. An employee who comes back to work for you could turn right around and sue you again if he believed you are continuing to discriminate.

No fury like a (pregnant) woman scorned

05/11/2017
A Florida insurance brokerage has agreed to pay $100,000 and change its policies to settle charges it discriminated against a job applicant because of her pregnancy.