• The HR Specialist - Print Newsletter
  • HR Specialist: Employment Law
  • The HR Weekly

ADA

Shine a light on SAD, ADA accommodations and the FMLA

10/30/2009

As the winter months set in, some people may notice that they feel more tired, experience weight gain or struggle to get out of bed in the morning. While the majority of people who experience these symptoms have nothing more serious than the “winter blues,” others suffer from a potentially debilitating condition known as seasonal affective disorder (SAD). Be careful not to brush off employees who complain of SAD.

Accommodating disabled employees: Updated DOL web site makes your job easier

10/27/2009

When employees say they’re having trouble completing their job duties because of their ADA-qualifying disabilities, employers are required to enter into an “interactive process” to find accommodations that allow them to perform the job’s essential functions. That’s where the newly updated, redesigned Job Accommodation Network (JAN) site can come in handy.

Attempted suicide: Proof of disability … or grounds for dismissal?

10/27/2009

Effective HR pros often have to balance sensitivity and compassion with hard-nosed business realities. Never will that dichotomy be more severely tested than when an employee attempts suicide. Then you’ll have to consider the employee’s situation, ADA and FMLA rules … and your obligation to maintain an environment that’s safe for other workers.

Know the FMLA, ADA rules when employee asks for time off to care for disabled relative

10/27/2009

Employees who need to take care of a disabled relative may be eligible for FMLA leave if the disability qualifies as a serious health condition—but only if the employee has worked enough hours to be eligible for FMLA leave. Likewise, employees sometimes think their employers must provide them with reasonable accommodations so they can care for a disabled relative under the ADA’s so-called association clause—that’s simply not true.

Detail concerns before ordering fitness exams

10/13/2009

Under EEOC guidelines, employers can demand a fitness-for-duty exam if they can prove they have a reasonable belief—based on objective evidence—that an employee’s medical condition will impair his or her ability to perform the essential functions of the job or pose a safety threat. If you believe either is the case, make sure you document your objective and reasonable beliefs before demanding the exam.

Helping worker dodge jury duty with medical excuse doesn’t amount to disability

10/13/2009

Here’s a novel twist on the ADA violation of regarding someone as disabled. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that an employer doesn’t necessarily consider an employee disabled just because a manager uses a health-related excuse to help a worker get out of jury duty.

ADA ruling: Coming to work is an essential job function

10/09/2009

A federal trial court has concluded that coming to work is an essential function of one’s job. Therefore, the ADA doesn’t cover disabled employees who can’t meet that basic requirement.

What’s an ADA disability?…. And nine more questions you’d better be able to answer

10/06/2009

The EEOC has issued proposed regulations for enforcing the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAA), a sweeping law that took effect earlier this year. Among the changes: a new definition of what constitutes an ADA disability. With the EEOC in charge of suing to force compliance, you need to know the answers to these 10 questions.

What’s an ADA disability?…. And seven more questions you’d better be able to answer

10/06/2009

2009 was a watershed year for disability discrimination. The EEOC received a record number of disability-related charges – 21,451. What’s the reason for the spike in discrimination claims? The Americans With Disabilities Act Amendment Act. With the EEOC in charge of suing to force compliance, you need to know the answers to these eight questions.

UPS picks up EEOC ADA lawsuit

10/01/2009

The EEOC has filed a disability discrimination lawsuit against UPS in federal court in Chicago. The suit alleges the package delivery giant consistently refuses to allow disabled workers to take extended medical leave as a reasonable accommodation. The EEOC filing seeks to make the suit a class action.